Tuesday, June 5, 2007

The blind and the lame shall not come into the house - btw - THE KING JAMES BIBLE IS STILL PERFECT TODAY!

The blind and the lame shall not come into the house

2 Sam 5:8 offers this statement as do other places - Malachi 1 being another that I know well from one of the greates messages that I have ever heard (Inspecting our Service to God - Pastor Bob Brado - 2002)

Is this a difficult statement, in some ways perhaps but without much time this morning I wanted to give a couple spiritual applications

1) Blind and lame are obvious handicaps (is that still PC to say?). Someone with one of these conditions will be noticed because it is outward and not easily hidden.
2) Those with a handicap like this are certainly well capable of doing many useful and important things of great benefit but in this case (from a spiritual perspective I am referring) someone with a handicap should not be in the house (in the service of God actively ministering).
3) God expects our best, a sacrifice that is given to Him is to be whole and unspotted.
4) Might we consider that if God wants those that are brought into our house with no obvious handicaps that this could be applied to say that we as Christians need to be sure that what is brought in the house is whole and pure in all areas that are readily apparent to us prior to allowing them to serve in certain capacities. If there is a blatent deficiency - whether it be in doctrine, in testimony, whatever - there should be disqualification until their be healing. Consider the implications of how many people that one can influence if there is an area of blatent deficiency that seems to be acceptible. Why else does God provide the qualifications of deacons and pastors in the 5t's. Example - we had an experienced agent in the call center coaching our newer team of agents just coming out of training. The experienced agent was taking the calls and the others were typing for him and listening to how he handled it. I happened to silent monitor one of the calls. On this call the agent told the customer something that was inaccurate and I know for a fact that the agent knows the right information. I never would have anticipated that this agent would say something like this. The inaccurate way creates a much shorter call with less trouble for the agent but obviously is a disservice to the customer. Because the three new agents were sitting with him, they consider him an authority and will understandably mimic his handling of the issue. Now I have 4 agents that will likely continue this which will multiply over all of the customers that they deal with. This is very dangerous. The next step was to openly talk to the agent in correction and be certain that the new agents know that the info given is wrong, that it must be corrected to the customer that heard it and that there will be accountability when the expectations of service are not met.
The first and foremost application of this is that we must consider our ways - are we unblemished, are we sanctified, is our service to God acceptible or do we have eyes blinded by the world, ears plugged from hearing God's voice, lame legs not willing to move at God's command or bad doctrine that will lead others astray? God doesnt imply here that if someone has one useful thing to offer despite other blatent handicaps that they should be used but rather if they have a single handicap they should be eliminated until there has been healing in that area.

Next Chapter - I have preached 2 Sam 6 and love the text primarily because it demonstrates an important and often overlooked truth - it shows that just any way of doing something doesn't cut it with God. David was attempting to move the ark. He has his new cart - it will be the fastest and easiest way to get that cart from point A to point B (from man's reasoning). One problem, that is not the best way in God's eyes - it is not His ordained way. God uses sanctified men to accomplish His work and He gives us His word to tell us just how we are to do it. When we try on our own power with our methods and our standards then our ways will falter and it will cost lives and souls.

Hag 1:5-7
(5) Now therefore thus saith the LORD of hosts; Consider your ways.
(6) Ye have sown much, and bring in little; ye eat, but ye have not enough; ye drink, but ye are not filled with drink; ye clothe you, but there is none warm; and he that earneth wages earneth wages to put it into a bag with holes.
(7) Thus saith the LORD of hosts; Consider your ways.

Our ways are not His ways nor are our thoughts His thoughts - Isa. 55

There are many factors to consider in bringing people into the house, into service and how we go about our service. Our heart - absolutely, our motives - absolutely (Sermon on the mount) - our methods - Absolutely.
God could have made creation to work in a much less complex manner. He could have allowed for everyone and everything to do as it wanted and yet all would work just fine. He did not have to have a water cycle, a food chain etc. Certain species would not have to rely on other species which rely on other species etc in order to form the stability needed - yet it does.
There is an order, a structure, a complexity, a set of rules that nature abides by - sodomites try to defy that proper order of how God designed things, yet try as they might they cannot overcome God and it causes confusion and death.
God has standards - we always try our ways of doing things (like leaves for a covering) and he rejects that. Lets do things His way - lets seek God's ways and be sure that the offerings and service we give are not blind and lame in His eyes.

5 comments:

Hindsey said...

Well, I didn't want to comment when I saw your labels were alliterated, but I gave in...

I think you present a true principle that is taught in Scripture. At the same time, there are difficulties. I'll use Paul & Barnabas's interaction with John Mark. It appears Paul took the course of: Mark is blemished and shouldn't be in the ministry. Barnabas thought either Paul was wrong or that the blemish was not severe enough. (And let's not forget that Barnabas was not just some Joe Schmoe, but one of Paul's teachers too.) The Bible doesn't say who was right.

I think an easy principle to say and to enforce is: If a person that is presented with a sin from Scripture is unwilling to give up that sin, then he is disqualified from ministering on behalf of the church. If I were hooked on pornography and justified it by saying it didn't hurt anybody else - but then I was confronted with Matthew 5:28, but was unwilling to give up the pornography - I should be disqualified from ministry. That one is easy to identify. Like you said, those "areas that are readily apparent" should be dealt with.

If something is presented in Scripture as a sin, yet the person disagrees with whether or not that is really taught, for example, the teaching that hair gel is ungodly - someone (carnal) might disagree and say Scripture doesn't teach that. At that point, I think it becomes an issue that the Pastor of the church has to decide what the limits will be. Our Pastor has decided to allow hair gel. What can we do? (I hope I didn't corrupt the real meat of this paragraph by my humor.)

I have talked with Barone about something along these lines in the past, and I know he has a thought on it. Rather than steal his thunder, I'll have him read it and see if he'd like to comment.

Great post. I need to consider my ways - that's for sure.

Aaron Putney said...

Agreed, good post.
We dont know who was right concerning Mark. I guess I figure that either 1) Paul lessened his standards (expectations) concerning Mark later on or 2)Mark matured/changed his ways to meet the criteria Paul found lacking originally because in the end he was recognized by Paul as profitable... Paul didnt suggest throwing the Mark's away but that he was not ready for the task ahead with Paul. This is where a Barnabas can further disciple them before they are actively ministering (IF there was an issue there - we dont know). I see that as maybe being what happened.

I did specify readily apparent issues which doesn't suggest preferences to the hair gel level. Absolutely I meant blatent sin or blatently bad doctrine.

Patch the Pirate sings it best - lean a lean a lean a lean a lean to the right, dont ya lean a lean a lean a lean to the wrong - stay away from sin or ya might fall in... lean a lean alean a lean a lean to the right

WEET said...

Where would one find the Inspecting our Service to God sermon from Pastor Brado?

WEET said...

Where would one find the Inspecting our Service to God message from Pastor Brado?

Aaron Putney said...

Good question Peter - both times it was asked :)
the FBBC site - likely for space reasons has pulled all of the messages prior to 2005. There is a catalog of messages though in the bookstore which should have it. It was I believe October of 2002.

I have it backed up somewhere but not sure where right now. If I find it I will get it to you.